ENGLISH HOME LANGUAGE
GRADE 12
PAPER 3 
NSC PAST PAPERS AND MEMOS
SEPTEMBER 2017

INFORMATION FOR THE MARKER 
In assessing a candidate’s work, the following aspects, among others, drawn from the  assessment rubric, must be borne in mind: 

  • The overall effect of planning, drafting, proofreading and editing of the work on  the final text produced.
  • Awareness of writing for a specific purpose, audience and context – as well as  register, style and tone – especially in Section B. 
  • Grammar, spelling and punctuation.
  • Language structures, including an awareness of critical language.
  • Choice of words and idiomatic language. 
  • Sentence construction. 
  • Paragraphing. 
  • Interpretation of the topic that will be reflected in the overall content: the  introduction, development of ideas, and the conclusion. 

NOTE: 

  • Various formats of transactional/referential/informational texts have been  taught/are in current practice. Therefore, this has to be considered when  assessing the format. 
  • Give credit for appropriateness of format. 
  • Look for a logical approach in all writing.

MEMORANDUM 

SUGGESTED APPROACH TO MARKING 
SECTION A: ESSAY 
1.1 POSSIBLE RESPONSES 

  • Narrative/reflective
  • Finding a solution 
  • Looking back on a problem [50] 

1.2 POSSIBLE RESPONSES 

  • Descriptive/narrative/reflective 
  • A change/the unexpected/the unknown/a twist/the unpredictable 
  • Obscured future [50] 

1.3 POSSIBLE RESPONSES 

  • Argumentative/discursive/narrative/reflective
  • Emphasis on personal responsibility/importance of the individual
  • Need for change [50] 

1.4 POSSIBLE RESPONSES 

  • Argumentative/discursive/narrative/reflective
  • Criticism of mob mentality/conformity/blindly following
  • Effect of propaganda/inability to think for oneself [50] 

1.5 POSSIBLE RESPONSES 

  • Discursive/narrative/reflective/descriptive
  • Variety of the day/life
  • Changing perceptions/perspectives [50] 

1.6
1.6.1 POSSIBLE RESPONSES 

  • Narrative/discursive/reflective/descriptive
  • Freedom/escape/achievement
  • Hunting/being the hunter or the prey
  • Focus of attention/being alert/searching [50] 

1.6.2 POSSIBLE RESPONSES  

  • Narrative/discursive/reflective/descriptive
  • Gaining perspective/seeing things from another’s point of view
  • School [50] 

1.6.3 POSSIBLE RESPONSES 

  • Narrative/discursive/reflective/descriptive
  • Africa/nature/the strength of your roots/foundations
  • Self-reliance/dependence/independence/inter-dependence/growth [50]

TOTAL SECTION A: 50

Related Items

INSTRUCTIONS TO MARKERS 
Refer to SECTION A: Rubric for Assessing an Essay found on page 7 of this  memorandum. 

CRITERIA USED FOR ASSESSMENT

CRITERIA 

MARKS

CONTENT AND PLANNING 

30

LANGUAGE, STYLE AND EDITING 

15

STRUCTURE 

5

TOTAL 

50

  1. Read the whole piece and decide on a category for CONTENT AND  PLANNING. 
  2. Re-read the piece and select the appropriate category for LANGUAGE, STYLE  AND EDITING. 
  3. Re-read the piece and select the appropriate category for STRUCTURE.

SECTION B: TRANSACTIONAL TEXT 
LEARNERS ARE INSTRUCTED TO ANSWER TWO QUESTIONS 
QUESTION 2 
2.1 REVIEW 

  • Response to the modernisation and controversial changes
  • Reference to the aspects of a review
  • Recommendation to learners [25] 

2.2 FORMAL LETTER TO THE PRESS 

  • Formal register
  • References to/examples of consumer distrust
  • Consumer reaction [25] 

2.3 LETTER OF REQUEST 

  • Formal register
  • Identification of charity/cause/welfare association and reasons for choice
  • Motivation and details of required sponsorship [25] 

2.4 AGENDA AND MINUTES 

  • Formal language
  • Use of past tense
  • Minutes must be aligned to the agenda [25] 

2.5 FORMAL SPEECH 

  • Formal situation 
  • Focus is on effective communication to ensure success at school and  beyond
  • Peer target audience [25] 

2.6 INTERVIEW 

  • Continuation of the story of his life
  • Inspirational content required
  • Informal register acceptable [25]

INSTRUCTIONS TO MARKERS 
Refer to SECTION B: Rubric for Assessing Transactional Texts found on  page 8 of this memorandum. 

CRITERIA USED FOR ASSESSMENT

CRITERIA 

MARKS

CONTENT, PLANNING AND FORMAT 

15

LANGUAGE, STYLE AND EDITING 

10

TOTAL 

25

  1. Read the whole piece and decide on a category for CONTENT, PLANNING AND FORMAT. 
  2. Re-read the piece and select the appropriate category for LANGUAGE,  STYLE AND EDITING. 

TOTAL SECTION B: 50 
GRAND TOTAL: 100

RUBRIC FOR ASSESSING ESSAY [50 MARKS]

Criteria 

 

Exceptional 

Skilful 

Moderate 

Elementary 

Inadequate 

CONTENT  AND  PLANNING 
(Response and  ideas) 

  • Organisation of  ideas for planning Awareness of  purpose,  audience and  context 

30 MARKS

UPPER LEVEL

28–30 

22–24 

16–18 

10–12 

4–6

  • Outstanding/Striking  response beyond  normal expectations.
  • Intelligent, thought provoking and mature  ideas 
  • Exceptionally well  organised and coherent  (connected) including  introduction, body and  conclusion/ending.
  • Very well-crafted  response. 
  • Fully relevant and  interesting. 
  • Ideas with evidence of  maturity 
  • Very well organised and  coherent (connected)  including introduction,  body and conclusion/ending.
  • Satisfactory response 
  • Ideas are reasonably  coherent and  convincing. 
  • Reasonably  organised and  coherent including  introduction, body and  conclusion/ending
  • Inconsistently  coherent response 
  • Unclear ideas and  unoriginal 
  • Little evidence of  organisation and coherence.
  • Totally irrelevant  response 
  • Confused and  unfocused ideas
  • Vague and  repetitive 
  •  Unorganised  and incoherent

LOWER LEVEL

25–27 

19–21 

13–15 

7–9 

0–3

  • Excellent response but  lacks the exceptionally  striking qualities of the  outstanding essay 
  • Mature and intelligent  ideas 
  • Skilfully organised and  coherent (connected)  including introduction,  body and  conclusion/ending.
  •  Well-crafted response. 
  • Relevant and interesting  ideas. 
  • Well organised and  coherent (connected)  including introduction,  body and conclusion.
  • Satisfactory response  but some lapses in clarity. 
  • Ideas are fairly  coherent and  convincing. 
  • Some degree of  organisation and  coherence including  introduction, body  and conclusion.
  • Largely irrelevant  response. 
  • Ideas tend to be  disconnected and  confusing. 
  • Hardly any  evidence of  organisation and  coherence.
  • No attempt to respond to the topic 
  • Completely irrelevant and  inappropriate
  • Unfocused and  muddled

LANGUAGE,  STYLE AND EDITING 

  • Tone, register,  style, vocabulary  appropriate to purpose/effect  and context
  • Word choice
  • Language use  and conventions,  punctuation, grammar, spelling

15 MARKS

UPPER LEVEL

14–15 

11–12 

8–9 

5–6 

0–3

  • Tone, register, style,  vocabulary highly  appropriate to purpose,  audience and context
  • Language confident,  exceptionally  impressive compelling  and rhetorically effective  in tone. 
  • Virtually error-free in  grammar and spelling.
  • Highly skilfully crafted.
  • Tone, register, style and  vocabulary very  appropriate to purpose,  audience and context. 
  • Language is effective and  a consistently appropriate  tone is used. 
  • Largely error-free in  grammar and spelling.
  • Very well crafted.
  • Tone, register, style  and vocabulary  appropriate to  purpose, audience and context. 
  • Appropriate use of  language to convey  meaning. 
  •  Tone is appropriate.
  • Rhetorical devices  used to enhance  content.
  • Tone, register, style  and vocabulary not  appropriate to  purpose, audience  and context. 
  • Very basic use of  language. 
  • Tone and diction  are inappropriate. 
  • Very limited  vocabulary.
  • Language  incomprehensible 
  • Tone, register,  style and  vocabulary less  appropriate  to purpose,  audience and  context 
  • Vocabulary  limitations so  extreme as to make  comprehension  impossible

LOWER LEVEL

13 

10 

4

  • Language excellent and  rhetorically effective in  tone. 
  • Virtually error-free in  grammar and spelling.
  • Skilfully crafted.
  • Language engaging and  generally effective 
  •  Appropriate and effective  tone. 
  •  Few errors in grammar  and spelling. 
  • Well-crafted
  • Adequate use of  language with some  inconsistencies. 
  • Tone generally  appropriate and  limited use of  rhetorical devices.
  • Inadequate use of  language. 
  •  Little or no variety  in sentence. 
  •  Exceptionally  limited vocabulary.

STRUCTURE  

  • Features of text  Paragraph  development  and sentence  construction  

5 MARKS

 

0–1

  • Excellent development  of topic 
  •  Exceptional detail 
  •  Sentences, paragraphs  exceptionally well constructed
  • Logical development of  details 
  • Coherent 
  • Sentences, paragraphs  logical, varied
  • Relevant details  developed 
  • Sentences,  paragraphs well constructed 
  • Essay still makes  sense
  • Some valid points
  • Sentences and  paragraphs faulty 
  • Essay still makes  sense despite flaws.
  • Necessary  points lacking 
  • Sentences and  paragraphs faulty

MARKS RANGE 

 

40–50 

30–39 

20–29 

10–19 

0–9

ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR LONGER TRANSACTIONAL TEXT HOME LANGUAGE [25 MARKS]

Criteria 

Exceptional 

Skilful 

Moderate 

Elementary 

Inadequate

CONTENT  PLANNING  AND FORMAT 

  • Response and  ideas 
  • Organisation of  ideas for  planning 
  • Purpose,  audience and  features/  conventions  and context  

15 MARKS

13-15 

10-12 

7-9 

4-6 

0-3

  • Outstanding  response  beyond normal  expectations 
  •  Intelligent and  mature ideas
  • Extensive  knowledge of  features of the  type of text 
  •  Writing  maintains focus 
  • Coherence in  content and ideas.
  • Highly  elaborated and  all details  support the  topic 
  • Appropriate  and accurate  format 
  • Very good  response  demonstrating  good  knowledge of  features of the  type of text. 
  • Maintains focus  – no  digressions.
  • Coherent in  content and  ideas, very well  elaborated and  details support  topic. 
  • Appropriate  format with  minor  inaccuracies. 
  • Adequate  response  demonstrating  knowledge of  features of the  type of text. 
  • Not completely  focused – some  digressions. 
  • Reasonably  coherent in  content and  ideas 
  •  Some details  support the  topic   
  • Generally  appropriate  format but with  some  inaccuracies. 
  • Basic response  demonstrating  some  knowledge of  features of the  type of text. 
  •  Some focus but  writing  digresses. 
  • Not always  coherent in  content and  ideas.  Few details  support the topic
  • Has vaguely  applied  necessary rules  of format 
  • Some critical  oversights.
  • Response  reveals no  knowledge of  features of the  type of text 
  •  Meaning is  obscure with  major  digressions. 
  •  Not coherent in  content and  ideas. Very few  details support  the topic. 
  •  Has not applied  necessary  rules of format.

LANGUAGE,  STYLE AND  EDITING 

  • Tone, register,  style, purpose/ effect,  audience and  context 
  • Language use  and  conventions.
  • Word choice 
  • Punctuation,  spelling 

10 MARKS

9-10 

7-8 

5-6 

3-4 

0-2

  • Tone, register,  style,  vocabulary  highly  appropriate to  purpose,  audience and  context 
  •  Grammatically  accurate and  well constructed 
  •  Virtually error free. 
  • Tone, register,  style and vocabulary very  appropriate to  purpose,  audience and  context 
  •  Generally  grammatically  accurate and  well constructed 
  • Very good  vocabulary 
  •  Mostly free of  errors
  • Tone, register,  style and vocabulary  appropriate to  purpose,  audience and  context. 
  • Some  grammatical  errors 
  • Adequate  vocabulary 
  •  Errors do not  impede  meaning
  • Tone, register,  style and  vocabulary less  appropriate to  purpose,  audience and  context
  • Inaccurate  grammar with  numerous  errors 
  • Limited  vocabulary 
  • Meaning is  obscured.
  • Tone, register,  style and  vocabulary do not correspond  to purpose,  audience and  context. 
  • Error-ridden and confused 
  • Vocabulary not  suitable for  purpose 
  • Meaning  seriously  obscured

MARKS RANGE 

20–25 

15–19 

10–14 

5–9 

0–4

Last modified on Wednesday, 14 July 2021 07:26